Prepare to listen…
The most profound products are the result of a process of discovery moreso than an act of creation. You should never have to say “I did it!”; if you’ve prepared yourself properly to listen, the world will tell you “You found it!”
The most profound products are the result of a process of discovery moreso than an act of creation. You should never have to say “I did it!”; if you’ve prepared yourself properly to listen, the world will tell you “You found it!”
So, I think “startup accelerators per capita” may be a relevant metric for even third tier cities at this point. They are everywhere, including places they probably shouldn’t be. Some are coming around to realizing that they have done too little, too late to compete for VC attention from outside of their region. Some have had results that are anti-climactic and cyclical; no big post-demo-day Sand Hill Road VC investment announcement to catapult them into relevance, which results in a lackluster field of applicants for the following class. Repeat.
To apply some Econ 101 to this timeline; startup accelerators, as an industry, have (appropriately) matured very quickly. Analogizing the entrepreneurs as the customers, low-cost imitators have popped up everywhere, but only a few (YCombinator, TechStars, etc.) provided a premium product with an indelible “brand” before this occurred. Some of the imitators are also diligent emulators and provide a great deal of value. Others are simply predatory VC’s in sheep’s clothing, more interested in double coupon day for equity than anything else.
It seems today’s startup founders are far more aware of the differences in these than they once were, and the desirable startups are being much more selective about who they get in bed with. Indulge me again in some Econ 101 analogy…
To participate in any accelerator, startups (customers) are asked to spend two things; a little bit of equity (cheap) and a lot of time (priceless). The quid pro quo for equity is a fairly easy calculation; it’s expensive cash but it’s simply a bulky pill to swallow and unlikely to be the first you’ve needed to swallow as an entrepreneur. The time..well…that’s another matter.
Desirable startup customers value their time above all. The evidence that the time investment will provide the desired return, in my honest opinion, will be the differentiator between the accelerators that survive the maturity of the industry and those that don’t. TechStars shares the founder experience with the world in a dozen different ways; nobody offers up public evidence of time well spent like they do.
Some of the imitators don’t tweet, post, or update their websites for weeks at a time. The startup that applies for such a program without any evidence of a return on time is not making responsible founder decisions, in my honest opinion. Have at ‘em, imitators.
So what are the smart founders of desirable startups doing? If they’ve got a technology that is largely Internet-based and has high potential for low-cost (read: viral) distribution, the YCombinators and TechStars of the world have evidence in the form of an A-list of accomplished mentors of the same ilk, coupled with a resultant portfolio (the hard part) that assuages any remaining doubts that the time spent will be worthwhile. The good imitators can do the same. They get the wheat.
The bad imitators say, “But, we’ve got CASH!”. They get the chaff.
But what if you’ve got an amazing startup but you’re in an industry with some form of barriers to entry, the help you need most requires deep industry expertise, and/or your product requires a specialized environment/facilities/equipment for iteration? First, the top-tier accelerators aren’t going to be super-interested in you, and you probably shouldn’t be super-interested in them. For these companies (and there are plenty), they are going to need a LOT of industry-specific evidence that a return on their time investment can be expected.
TechStars is clearly seeing this coming, first with TS Cloud last year and the new Nike+ Accelerator. Industry-specific acceleration amidst the TechStars “Do More Faster (TM)” culture. Win.
I’ve been thinking about this a lot lately. Is this the formula for a new breed of accelerators? Ones that will bring accelerated innovation to previously untouched industries?
I love St. Louis. Having worked in Los Angeles, Boulder, New York, Florida, and elsewhere; I’ve always come back. It’s the place my children will always call home, and I’m excited for its future as a startup community.
Those of us in the entrepreneurial community here all imagine talented people of enormous potential will either stay or come here, take risks with their livelihood, and build great things. Right? Good. We should all want that.
Thus we can’t afford to kid ourselves. We’re perennially one of the Most Dangerous Cities. We have a schizophrenically extreme climate, yet you have to get on a plane to legitimately snowboard, ski, or surf. We’re a good city, but we’re not exactly a “lifestyle”.
For those founders that don’t already call St. Louis home, cheap cost of living and a “me too” startup accelerator aren’t going to make our blemishes go overlooked. Arch Grants knows that…$50k free cash for your biz is some serious grease. Still, is it enough to get really promising founders to choose St. Louis over another city? Or will we always be getting the chaff?
So what’s the next big thing?
Gotta thank my wife for this one. She gets me.
So now I realize that I’ve actually numbered these damn things. Somebody is going to give me trouble over why I “prioritized” one over another. Preemptively speaking, that is certainly not the case. To the one that would have given me grief, screw you for thinking it.
Luke Beatty: TechStars Entrepreneur-in-Residence; Founder of Associated Content (Acquired by Yahoo! in 2010)
“I’m not going down the rabbit-hole with you. We’re keeping this simple, and here’s how we’re doing it.”
So I might have a bit of a man-crush on Luke. I can say it. It actually has very little to do with what he’s done (which seems weird to say, since we’re all pretty much trying to do EXACTLY what he’s already done). It has more to do with the way he looks at things, and the sheer talent he has for looking at your world the way you SHOULD be looking at your world.
One of commonalities amongst all TechStars teams is domain expertise. Everyone here has proven on some meaningful level that they know and understand the space they are going after. The downside of this is that we like to play in the weeds. Our understanding of the space makes us want to focus on all the little things we know that others don’t, and that we think are the things that make us the right people to accomplish what we’re trying to accomplish.
That can be helpful as you fine-tune your product and tailor your solution. It can be confusing and off-putting when you’re talking about your company, pitching, and even marketing your product(s) to the masses.
Unless you’re in “stealth mode” (ugh) and trying to NOT talk to people about your startup/idea/invention, you’ve inevitably come to the point where you realize that something you thought was going to be important and impactful turns out to be altogether disinteresting to anyone but you. It doesn’t mean it’s not important. It just means you don’t need to talk about it. Not right now. That may mean that some people in the world may never fully appreciate exactly how damn smart you are. It’s OK; those folks never mattered to you anyway. Trust me.
The truth is, when we’re good at what we do and passionate in the convictions that drive us, we can always communicate that we’re the ones that will change our little piece of the world for the good. And we can be confident in letting the elevator pitch do what it is meant to do; pique the interest of those that matter. Then they ask questions. And you learn then about what matters. Later on, they may go down the rabbit hole with you one-on-one; those are important conversations and matter a lot (I LIVE for those).
Trying to introduce yourself with those conversations is just terrible. It sucks. Don’t do it.
We’ve met with Luke almost every week and two or three times in some weeks. I’ve had moments where I would be a full minute into a diarrhea-of-the-mouth, down-the-rabbit-hole diatribe when it became clear that he couldn’t give the slightest damn about what I was saying. He’d always be at 35,000 feet, never descending below 10,000 feet and damn sure not following us into the weeds.
And then he’d spit pure gold back at us. Sometimes it had little to do with what we were talking about; but it always had everything to do with what we should have been talking about. It’s something magical; he can conjure and propel at you a white-hot fireball of Truth like a a hyper-animated Yoda, all while sculpting out the right spots to graft in the “F” word like he’s wielding a surgical instrument.
Plus, it’s like the most non-challenging thing in the world for Luke to do. Easy-peasy. From this day forth, I’m on a Rocky-esque training montage journey to condition my brain to be half as effective as Luke at seeing the whole friggin’ thing at all times with the nonchalance of casting a fly rod.
Tim Enwall: TechStars Entrepreneur-in-Residence, Founder at Tendril Networks, Principal at Comstock Ventures, RollSale’s designated therapist and all-around amazing guy.
“Your startup should be a family.”
Any words I can come up with to describe how impactful Tim has been to our company culture will simply come out lame.
Fact: Starting a meaningful company is exhausting, emotional, exhilarating and sometimes terrifying. In a startup’s infancy, this rollercoaster takes a toll on everyone. There is a dichotomy in the passion it requires to build something meaningful, and the destruction that passion can bring to bear on your relationships if it isn’t recognized and managed before it goes to a dangerous place.
We’re a pretty healthy team; we hotly debate some things at times but I think we’re grateful that we’re all emotionally invested in the company to care enough to debate them. We were really lucky, I think, to recognize early on how much of himself Tim was willing to give to make sure we were becoming the family we needed to become. We have greedily taken advantage of every bit.
If you ever get the chance, I recommend you do the same. Here’s a little taste of what you’ll learn:
Next Up: Luke Beatty
So, I’m not a great blogger. I don’t share the things in my head as often as I should, particularly not in a way that can be shared and helpful to others.
Now, I’ve got a real monkey on my back as we reach the final countdown to Demo Day, to somehow pay forward the amazing things the TechStars team and program have given to me, my co-founders, our company, and the other amazing teams here in the 2012 class that I truly love and care about; in fact, let me extend that to every TechStars alum that has been through this experience and selflessly shared their stories and experience.
Some weeks ago, we were all struggling with our elevator pitches, and it occurred to me that we all seemed to most effectively get to a succinct, dumbed-down “aha!” version of our elevator pitches by talking to others and listening to their knee-jerk responses. Sure, a lot of them were kind of worthless:
“So, you’re Zappos for car dealers?”
“Ummm…no.”
That’s how you know your talk track sucks. So you get better at it, and people start giving you better knee-jerk responses.
“So, you’re LendingTree for my used car?”
“Ummm…that’s actually exactly what we are.” Thank you, Nicole Glaros.
So, I’ve got a lot of favors to repay to a lot of folks here at TechStars that have been invaluable to us in an incredible variety of ways; and an adopted obligation to pay that help forward to others in our position. Here’s how I’m going to start:
I’m going to come up with elevator pitches for our mentors (and a few others here), and try to sum up what I believe was their “secret sauce” for us (or at least me) in the form of their elevator pitch. There is no possible way to sum up their entire value in such a way, because they are all crazy smart in a depth of disciplines, but I hope to maybe help some other entrepreneur with one of these every once in a while.
Since we’ve already mentioned Nicole here, I’ll start with her:
Nicole Glaros, Managing Director at TechStars Boulder:
“I will not let you waste my time, and you better f*cking not be wasting yours.”
Nicole is the single most badass person I know. Seriously. She is the Chuck Norris of mentorship. Take your flaky ideas in her office and her kung fu will leave them lying in a broken pile like so many poorly equipped evil henchmen. If you can’t see the value in that, you’re in trouble as an entrepreneur.
Honestly, you’re going to waste her time. Everyone does, and probably more often than not. She knows that, although she won’t say as much. But the honesty and passion she puts behind her feedback is probably the most effective form of love that can be expressed in the mentor/mentee relationship; and it drives you to bring her meaningful results and/or learnings.
Intimidating? Maybe a little for some. But for the ones that matter, you quickly learn a few things:
Next up: Tim Enwall
AutoTrader’s Trade-In Marketplace is designed to present convenience benefit to the consumer and fiscal benefit to the dealer: those values are designed to be so low that any dealer can buy the car and go make a wholesale profit selling it to another dealer at auction, even after paying significant auction fees (interestingly, about ~60% of annual North American auto auction revenue is made by Manheim, AutoTrader’s sister company). I recently got a Trade-In Marketplace figure of $9,947 on a Prius that I sold to a local dealer on rollsale.com for $12,800. So, anecdotally that’s a ~30% difference from the rollsale value.
Giving you a guess on the CarMax percentage is trickier because of the various factors at play:
loading tweets…
Top
Copyright 2012-2013 Mike Nichols.